Preparing for the New Workplace Right: The Right to Disconnect
Oliver Hume Appeal - Victorian Landholder Duty Applies on Capital Raising
On 8 August 2024, the Victorian Court of Appeal in Oliver Hume Property Funds (Broad Gully Rd) Diamond Creek Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] VSCA 175 confirmed that landholder duty applied on the separate acquisition of shares by 18 investors under a single capital raising. The Court held that that capital raising amounted to substantially one arrangement and therefore was a relevant acquisition for landholder duty purposes.
Sladen Snippet: Armidale Jockey Club - Racing clubs “clearance house” liable to pay superannuation guarantee to jockeys
This Decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) is a series of decisions against five jockey racing clubs brought by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) regarding whether the racing clubs must pay super contributions on behalf of jockeys under the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (SG Act).
Section 99B – TD 2024/D2 – you can’t always get what you need
Sladen Snippet - Quy v FCT: residency – decision overturned on appeal
We wrote about the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) in Quy v FCT [2024] AATA 245 here. In that decision, the Tribunal held that Mr Quy, who was physically in Australia for less than 2 months each year, was a resident of Australia for tax purposes.
Sladen Snippet - TD 2024/5 - How NALI is calculated for capital gains
Collective bargaining for franchisees: how to negotiate better terms together without raising competition concerns
Sladen Snippet - Neal v Brown – Super benefits withdrawn before death result in unintended consequence under deceased’s will
Tao - Becoming a sole director of a corporate trustee triggers landholder duty despite no acquisition of units in a unit trust
Session 4: Trusts and small business CGT concessions – Oil and water or peas and carrots?
The small business capital gains tax (CGT) concessions (Concessions) in Division 152 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 97) offer significant opportunities to reduce or eliminate tax levied on capital gains.1 However, despite a recent judicial pronouncement that the Concessions should be interpreted beneficially,2 the legislative conditions for relief are intricate and complex.
Sladen Snippet - Federal Court affirms Trustees in Bankruptcy are liable for capital gains tax on property dispositions
Options for flexibly rostering part-time employees
Sladen Legal Announces Promotions of Two New Shareholder Principals and Two Principal Lawyers
Sladen Legal is pleased to announce the promotion of two outstanding lawyers to the position of Shareholder Principal: Edward Skilton and Neil Brydges effective 1 July 2024. This promotion recognises their exceptional legal expertise, dedication to client service, and significant contributions to the firm's success.
Sladen Snippet – NALE changes pass parliament
Water Pipeline Subject To Duty As “Goods” For The Purpose Of The New South Wales Landholder Duty Provisions in Conexa Syndey Holdings
On 24 May 2024 the New South Wales Supreme Court held that landholder duty applied to value of a water carrying pipeline in Conexa Sydney Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2024] NSWSC 628.
Details Needed To Pursue Insolvent Trading Claims - Copeland as Liquidator of Skyworkers Pty Ltd (In Liq)) v Murace
On 18 January 2023 the Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in Copeland in his capacity as liquidator of Skyworkers Pty Limited (in Liquidation) v Murace [2023] FCA 14. The decision resulted in Liquidator’s insolvent trading claim against Mr Murace being struck out and costs awarded to the defendant, although the liquidator was then allowed to file a further statement of claim.
Determining Insolvency and Unreasonable Director Related Transactions: Stone (Liquidator), in the matter of RIC Admin Pty Ltd (in liq)
Guidance has been provided to liquidators by the Federal Court of Australia in Stone (Liquidator), in the matter of RIC Admin Pty Ltd (in liq) v Mandalinic (No 2) regarding the analysis of financial records required to determine the solvency of a company and what conduct of a director will constitute an unreasonable director related transaction.
Proving Insolvency: Re Clarinda Pty Ltd (in liq)
In Re Clarinda (liq) [2023] VSC 109, parties sought the leave of the Court to use documents produced in an earlier proceeding to demonstrate the insolvency of the company. Justice Connock ultimately allowed the documents to be reproduced on the basis that the issues in dispute are the same, or substantially the same, and set out the special circumstances which substantiate this reproduction.
