When warranties become an important tool for protection

When warranties become an important tool for protection

Well drafted warranties offer purchasers protection by providing an avenue to seek recovery in the event that what is acquired turns out to be different than what it was represented to be by the seller.

This article looks at a case involving a share sale agreement and the outcome achieved when action was taken against the seller due to a breach of warranties offered in the share sale agreement to the purchaser.

Are companies caught by Anti-Corruption legislation under Australian law?

Are companies caught by Anti-Corruption legislation under Australian law?

Over the past three years, the Australian Government has placed increasing significance on developing anti-corruption laws at both the domestic and international level. This article provides an overview of some of the legislation which govern this area in Australia, how corporations can be found liable and how to access guides to manage compliance.

Protecting Secured Interests: Important asset protection considerations from Jones (Admin) v Realtek Semiconductor Corp Nuheara Ltd (Admins Apptd) (No 1) [2025]

Protecting Secured Interests: Important asset protection considerations from Jones (Admin) v Realtek Semiconductor Corp Nuheara Ltd (Admins Apptd) (No 1) [2025]

The interests of a secured party are not unfailing, and appropriate attention should be given to ensuring that they are placed to receive the best outcome from administration. The extent of this susceptibility was highlighted in the recent Federal Court decision of Jones (Admin) v Realtek Semiconductor Corp Nuheara Ltd (Admins Apptd) (No 1) [2025].

Where an arrangement undermines the entitlements of a secured creditor, consideration should be had to the benefits conferred by the arrangement on other creditors broadly, particularly where the alternative is liquidation.

Changela v Dracoma: On demand loans not unreasonable director-related transactions

Changela v Dracoma: On demand loans not unreasonable director-related transactions

The NSW Court of Appeal has affirmed on-demand loan repayments to shadow directors were reasonable where the company was solvent and the payments caused no detriment and as such do not constitute a breach of the unreasonable director related transaction provisions in section 588FDA of the Corporations Act.

New Draft Victorian Revenue Ruling imposes stamp duty on apportioned land tax and windfall gains tax

New Draft Victorian Revenue Ruling imposes stamp duty on apportioned land tax and windfall gains tax

The Victorian State Revenue Office has issued a draft revenue ruling “Land transfer duty - Consideration - Assumption of tax liabilities” for comment that seeks to impose a new stamp duty on adjustments at settlement of property transfers.  This is an Australian first tax and will penalise commercial and other property transfers.

Alphington Developments Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue – payments made by vendor could not reduce purchase price for stamp duty purposes

Alphington Developments Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue – payments made by vendor could not reduce purchase price for stamp duty purposes

The Victorian Supreme Court in Alphington Developments Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] VSC 709 considered the dutiable value for a transfer of land under paragraph 20(1)(a) of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) and whether payments required to be made by the vendor under a contract were able to reduce the headline purchase price for stamp duty purposes.

Nunc Coepi Pty Ltd – Land Tax and Trusts decision

Nunc Coepi Pty Ltd – Land Tax and Trusts decision

The Appeal Panel within the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal determined whether the Tribunal erred in finding that the Trust Deed before them set out the trust as a special trust rather than a fixed trust within the meaning of section 3A of the Land Tax Management Act 1956 (NSW).

Bakers Delight Case: What Franchisors Need to Know About Workplace Liability

Bakers Delight Case: What Franchisors Need to Know About Workplace Liability

The Full Court of the Federal Court’s decision in Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2025] FCAFC 144 provides insight into the interaction between franchisor liability and ‘reverse onus’ mechanisms in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

 

Specifically, the Federal Court confirmed that franchisors can be held legally responsible for workplace contraventions by franchisees, even where the case against the franchisee relies on a ‘reverse onus of proof’. Franchisors are recommended to implement proactive compliance systems across their networks to avoid liability.

SMSFs and bare trusts – not just for LRBAs

SMSFs and bare trusts – not just for LRBAs

Many will be familiar with the use of bare trusts by SMSFs as part of a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA), but there are other ways in which an SMSF might invest via a bare trust, providing different structuring opportunities. This article considers the use of ‘non LRBA bare trusts’ by SMSFs and the superannuation law implications.

Sladen Snippet – PayDay Super Now Law: Key Changes to Employer Obligations, Disclosure, and Penalties

Sladen Snippet – PayDay Super Now Law: Key Changes to Employer Obligations, Disclosure, and Penalties

PayDay Super is now law, with changes effective from 1 July 2026. The reforms introduce a new voluntary disclosure regime and a new penalty framework for non-compliance. Stay ahead of the changes and understand your new obligations.

Session 11B: Tax effective death benefit planning

Session 11B: Tax effective death benefit planning

Increasingly, individuals hold a substantial amount of their wealth within the superannuation system. Productivity Commission research paper, Wealth transfers and their economic effects, December 2021 provides as follows:

XLZH - discretionary trusts and pre-CGT assets - more on this to come?

XLZH - discretionary trusts and pre-CGT assets - more on this to come?

The ART decision in XLZH v FCT looked at whether pre-CGT assets owned by a discretionary trust kept that status under Division 149 and to the extent to which ATO Ruling IT 2430 can be relied upon in applying Division 149.

 

#CGT, #Division 149, #discretionary trusts, #Tax, #IT 2430

Form vs Reality: Where franchisors may be liable for franchisee conduct – lessons from ASIC v Darranda.

Form vs Reality: Where franchisors may be liable for franchisee conduct – lessons from ASIC v Darranda.

The recent Federal Court decision in ASIC v Darranda Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1015 highlights that where a franchisor designs the systems, documents or marketing used by franchisees, it may be held liable for regulatory breaches in its network, even without direct dealings with consumers.

#franchising #franchisorliability #ASIC #RegulatoryCompliance

Sladen Snippet – New Div 296 tax – what we know and what we don’t?

Sladen Snippet – New Div 296 tax – what we know and what we don’t?

New Division 296 tax, as outlined in a Treasury Fact Sheet, includes two indexed thresholds ($3 million and $10 million) and taxation on realised (not unrealised) earnings from 1 July 2026. However, critical details about how realised earnings will be calculated—particularly regarding pre-1 July 2026 gains—remain unclear.

 

#superannuation #SMSF #tax #Div296 #totalsuperbalance #$3million #unrealisedgains #10million

Sladen Snippet - Treasurer announces major changes to Div 296 tax – including removal of tax on unrealised gains

Sladen Snippet - Treasurer announces major changes to Div 296 tax – including removal of tax on unrealised gains

Division 296 tax to be amended to remove taxation of unrealised capital gains, according to a media release by Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers.

 

#superannuation #SMSF #tax #Div296 #totalsuperbalance #$3million #unrealisedgains