Withholding information whilst negotiating agreements can amount to misleading and deceptive conduct. However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Sec New Line Pty Ltd v Muffin Break Pty Ltd provides important guidance on when silence will become deceptive, specifically in the context of lease and franchising renewals.
AusNet v FCT and back-to-back rollovers: nothing else matters?
ASIC -v- PayPal: How it assists understanding what constitutes an Unfair Contract Term
The Federal Court decision of ASIC v PayPal Australia Pty Limited [2024] FCA 762 further clarifies the statutory unfair contract terms regime with respect to standard form contracts and provides another example of ASIC successfully taking action to void an unfair contract term.
Businesses using standard form contracts should review their contracts for potentially unfair contract terms considering recent legislative and common law changes.
#unfaircontractterms #unfair #contract #standardform #ASIC
Sladen Snippet - Bendel and SMSFs – Part 4–Bendel and UPEs owing to SMSFs
As noted in part 1 of our articles on the application of the Bendel decision to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), in our view, it is likely that the Courts will apply the Bendel decision to the SIS Act, such that the expanded definition of loan in the SIS Act will apply to arrangements that involve the advancement of principal with an obligation to repay and that it will not apply to a mere creditor and debtor arrangement.
Sladen Snippet - Bendel and SMSFs – Part 3 –Bendel and the in-house asset rules
As noted in part 1 of our articles on the application of the Bendel decision to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), in our view, it is likely that the Courts will apply the Bendel decision to the SIS Act, such that the expanded definition of loan in the SIS Act will apply to arrangements that involve the advancement of principal with an obligation to repay and that it will not apply to a mere creditor and debtor arrangement (like a UPE).
In this part 3 of the series we examine how this may play out in the in-house asset rules contained in Part 8 of the SIS Act.
Sladen Snippet - Bendel and SMSFs – Part 2 –Bendel and section 65 of the SIS Act
As noted in part 1 of our articles on the application of the Bendel decision to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), in our view, it is likely that the Courts will apply the Bendel decision to the SIS Act, such that the expanded definition of loan in the SIS Act will apply to arrangements that involve the advancement of principal with an obligation to repay and that it will not apply to a mere creditor and debtor arrangement (like a UPE).
Sladen Snippet - Bendel and SMSFs – Part 1 – can Bendel be applied to the SIS Act?
As discussed here, the recent decision of the Full Federal Court (Court) in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Bendel) has been a significant one in the private tax world.
Sladen Snippet - Bendel: special leave and updated DIS - ATO fires a warning shot
On 19 February 2025, the Full Federal Court handed down its decision in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15. On 18 March 2025, the ATO applied for special leave and, on 19 March 2025, the ATO updated its interim decision statement (DIS) on the case.
We review the updated DIS below.
#Division 7A, #UPE, #Unpaid present entitlements, #Tax, #Trusts, #TD2022/11, #Bendel, #109D #Special leave #Decision Impact Statement
Payday super – exposure draft legislation now open for consultation
In the 2023-24 Budget, the Government announced that the super guarantee framework will be reformed to align the payment of super guarantee contributions with an employee’s regular pay cycle, instead of the current quarterly requirements.
The exposure draft legislation for the new ‘Payday Super’ rules has now been released, with consultation open until 11 April 2025.
The super guarantee charge, payable where employers fail to make contributions in full and on time, will be updated, including a new ‘administrative uplift’ component of up to 60% of the shortfall amount.
Sladen Snippet - QWYN – ART considers what is a superannuation pension (further challenge to the ATO’s view?)
In the decision of QWYN and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation and business) [2025] ARTA 83 the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) has determined that regular disability payments described as a superannuation income stream was a superannuation income stream for tax purposes and not a number of (more tax concessionally treated) disability lump sums.
Pursuing directors for insolvent trading: Can a creditor take action?
In certain circumstances creditors can take direct action against directors of companies in liquidation to recover insolvent trading losses suffered.
The process for doing so is to first try and obtain the liquidator’s consent and if they are not forthcoming, then take the steps required under subsections 588S and 588T of the Act.
Bendel – UPEs as loans – are the curtains closed?
On 19 February 2025, the Full Federal Court, in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Bendel), held that an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) with a corporate beneficiary is not a loan under subsection 109D(3) of Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).
Contempt of Court – Lessons from Ultratune’s $1.5 million fine for contempt
In an previous article discussing the ACCC’s enforcement priorities for 2024-25, we noted that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has continued to monitor strict compliance with small business codes of conduct, including the Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).
In particular, the ACCC had pursued UltraTune, for contempt of Court when Ultratune failed to comply with orders made by the court requiring Ultratune to take specific actions. On 28 January 2025, UltraTune’s appeal was dismissed by the Full Federal Court.
UltraTune’s story serves as an important reminder to ensure active monitoring of business’ compliance with all the obligations including those imposed on them by the law or court order and those that they might voluntarily agree to undertake.
Sladen Snippet - Division 296 tax, the proposed new $3 million super fund tax on unrealised gains, still not law
Division 296 tax, the proposed new $3 million super fund tax on unrealised gains, did not pass in the Senate yesterday, 13 February 2025.
Division 296, if passed, would impose an additional 15% tax on members with a $3 million or more total super balance (not indexed).
Division 296 is now unlikely to be put to the Senate before an election, and is expected to become a key election issue.
#division296 #$3million #unrealisedgains
Navigating a Restructure Under the Corporations Act: Protection Against Contractual Rights to Help Your Business Get Back on Track
If your business is restructuring, contractual rights triggered solely by the restructure or financial distress may be rendered unenforceable under section 454N of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This statutory protection can help a business stabilise and continue trading through difficult times. This article reviews a recent case of Okami SA Newton Pty Ltd v Newton SC Pty Ltd which considered the operation of this section.
Unequivocally exposed: Lessons learned from ASIC’s greenwashing case against Active Super
Active Super was found to have made false or misleading representations by using unequivocal language, and engaged in conduct liable to mislead the public in relation to investments it made.
The case provides further insights into the latest developments on ASIC’s ongoing greenwashing enforcement action.
Does failure to make minimum pension payments really cause a super pension to cease?
Last year, the ATO has updated its ruling TR 2013/5 Income tax: when a superannuation income stream commences and ceases. This included that the ATO’s view that if a super pension ceases (eg because of failure to make minimum pension payments, that a new pension will not start until a new pension commences (eg via new pension documents).
New ASIC Guidance on Insolvent Trading
On 6 December 2024, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) updated its Regulatory Guide: Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Guide for directors (RG 217).
The guide contains key principles intended to help directors comply with their duty to prevent insolvent trading and how to establish safe harbour protection through proactive monitoring and timely action.
Mergers and Acquisitions Reform
2025 will see the biggest changes to Australia’s Mergers and Acquisitions regulatory landscape for a considerable time. On 10 December 2024, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Mergers and Acquisitions Reform) Bill 2024 received Royal Assent resulting in a shift from a voluntary informal review scheme to a mandatory administrative review process. This is a clear statement to focus on protecting competition through merger control.