Sladen Thoughts
Stay up to date with Legal Industry news and updates. Sladen Legal provide regular updates on changes and news in the Australian Legal Industry.
If you are looking for our papers and journal articles including Taxation in Australia, The Tax Institute and SMSF Association, these are available in our Sladen Smart Membership Platform, become a member or login to gain exclusive access.
Author
- Alicia Hill
- Andrea Lin
- Daniel Smedley
- Dean Beaumont
- Edward Skilton
- Edward Hennebry
- Jake Cole
- James Gao
- Jan Harnischmacher
- Jasmine O'Brien
- Jordan Bauer
- Kaitilin Lowdon
- Kseniia Gasiuk
- Magdalena Njokos
- Matthew Davis
- Meagan O'Connor
- Michelle Dowdle
- Neil Brydges
- Neil Brydges
- Nicholas Clifton
- Nicholas Clifton
- Phil Broderick
- Phil Broderick
- Philippa Briglia
- Rob Jeremiah
- Sarah Wedd-Elliot
- Sladen Legal
- Sladen Legal
- Thomas Howell
- Victor Di Felice
- Will Monotti
- Will Monotti
Categories
- Asset Protection
- Business Contracts
- Business Law
- Business Structuring
- Business Succession
- Commercial Contracts
- Commercial Disputes
- Commercialisation
- Conference Papers
- Copyright
- Corporate Advisory
- Cryptocurrency
- Digital Law
- Dispute Resolution
- Employee Share Schemes
- Employment Law
- Entertainment and Sports
- Entrepreneurial
- Estate Disputes
- Estate Litigation
- Family Business
- Federal Taxes
- Franchising
- IP Disputes
- Insolvency
- Intellectual Property
- Inventions
- Land Tax
- Landholder Duty
- Learning
- Managing IP
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Payroll Tax
- Personal Succession
- Property & Development
- Property Disputes
- Publications
- Sladen Legal News
- Sladen Snippet
- Small Business
- Stamp Duty
- Startups
- State Tax Disputes
- State Taxes
- Superannuation
- Tax Consolidation
- Tax Disputes
- Taxation
- Technology
- Trade Marks
Conexa - Water Pipeline is an Interest in Land and Subject to Landholder Duty
The New South Wales Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against a decision that a pipeline was dutiable for the purposes of the New South Wales landholder duty provisions in Conexa Sydney Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] NSWCA 20.
Can you recover landholder duty from other parties (including from shareholders) - Aviation 3030 Pty Ltd
The Victorian Supreme Court decision of Aviation 3030 Pty Ltd (in liq) v Lao Holdings Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 800 has considered the ability for a company to recover landholder duty from the shareholders that had made the relevant acquisition.
Oliver Hume Appeal - Victorian Landholder Duty Applies on Capital Raising
On 8 August 2024, the Victorian Court of Appeal in Oliver Hume Property Funds (Broad Gully Rd) Diamond Creek Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] VSCA 175 confirmed that landholder duty applied on the separate acquisition of shares by 18 investors under a single capital raising. The Court held that that capital raising amounted to substantially one arrangement and therefore was a relevant acquisition for landholder duty purposes.
Tao - Becoming a sole director of a corporate trustee triggers landholder duty despite no acquisition of units in a unit trust
The VCAT decision of Tao v Commissioner of State Revenue (Review and Regulation) [2024] VCAT 637 has confirmed the breadth of the Victorian landholder duty change of control provisions - despite no acquisition of units in a unit trust.
Water Pipeline Subject To Duty As “Goods” For The Purpose Of The New South Wales Landholder Duty Provisions in Conexa Syndey Holdings
On 24 May 2024 the New South Wales Supreme Court held that landholder duty applied to value of a water carrying pipeline in Conexa Sydney Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2024] NSWSC 628.
Razzy Part 3 – what is ‘in connection with’ ceasing to be a member of a super fund for the section 40 duty exemption?
This final part of our 3 part series on the decision of Razzy Australia Pty Ltd & Anor v Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] VSC 124 looks at the requirement under the super fund to super fund duty exemption (as contained in section 40 of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) (Act)) that a person ceases to be a member of a complying superannuation
Razzy Part 2 – Does the super fund to super fund duty exemption apply to the redemption of units?
In this part 2 of our series on the decision of Razzy Australia Pty Ltd & Anor v Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] VSC 124 we look at whether the exemption in section 40 of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) (Act) includes transactions other than transfers.
Razzy Part 1 – Are exempt transfers aggregated for landholder duty?
The recent Supreme Court of Victoria decision of Razzy Australia Pty Ltd & Anor v Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] VSC 124 is a seminal decision as it provides much sought clarification on the application of various aspects of Chapter 3 of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) (Act)
Sladen snippet: Victorian relief measures in response to the bushfires and COVID-19 pandemic now law
As of 1 May 2020, the State Taxation Acts Amendment (Relief Measures) Act 2020 (Vic) introduces various changes to land transfer duty and payroll tax relief measures as part of the government’s response to provide relief measures for bushfire affected areas and the COVID-19 pandemic.