Sladen Snippet - QWYN – ART considers what is a superannuation pension (further challenge to the ATO’s view?)

Sladen Snippet - QWYN – ART considers what is a superannuation pension (further challenge to the ATO’s view?)

In the decision of QWYN and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation and business) [2025] ARTA 83 the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) has determined that regular disability payments described as a superannuation income stream was a superannuation income stream for tax purposes and not a number of (more tax concessionally treated) disability lump sums.

Pursuing directors for insolvent trading: Can a creditor take action?

Pursuing directors for insolvent trading: Can a creditor take action?

In certain circumstances creditors can take direct action against directors of companies in liquidation  to recover insolvent trading losses suffered.

The process for doing so is to first try and obtain the liquidator’s consent and if they are not forthcoming, then take the steps required under subsections 588S and 588T of the Act.

Conexa - Water Pipeline is an Interest in Land and Subject to Landholder Duty

Conexa - Water Pipeline is an Interest in Land and Subject to Landholder Duty

The New South Wales Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against a decision that a pipeline was dutiable for the purposes of the New South Wales landholder duty provisions in Conexa Sydney Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] NSWCA 20.

Sladen Legal Joins The Law Firm Network

Sladen Legal Joins The Law Firm Network

Sladen Legal is proud to announce its membership in The Law Firm Network, a distinguished global association of independent law firms. This network enhances Sladen Legal’s ability to support clients who require international representation as well as clients of network firms seeking specialist Australian representation. 

Bendel – UPEs as loans – are the curtains closed?

Bendel – UPEs as loans – are the curtains closed?

On 19 February 2025, the Full Federal Court, in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Bendel), held that an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) with a corporate beneficiary is not a loan under subsection 109D(3) of Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

Contempt of Court – Lessons from Ultratune’s $1.5 million fine for contempt

Contempt of Court – Lessons from Ultratune’s $1.5 million fine for contempt

In an previous article discussing the ACCC’s enforcement priorities for 2024-25, we noted that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has continued to monitor strict compliance with small business codes of conduct, including the Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).

 

In particular, the ACCC had pursued UltraTune, for contempt of Court when Ultratune failed to comply with orders made by the court requiring Ultratune to take specific actions. On 28 January 2025, UltraTune’s appeal was dismissed by the Full Federal Court.

 

UltraTune’s story serves as an important reminder to ensure active monitoring of business’ compliance with all the obligations including those imposed on them by the law or court order and those that they might voluntarily agree to undertake.

Sladen Snippet - Division 296 tax, the proposed new $3 million super fund tax on unrealised gains, still not law

Sladen Snippet - Division 296 tax, the proposed new $3 million super fund tax on unrealised gains, still not law

Division 296 tax, the proposed new $3 million super fund tax on unrealised gains, did not pass in the Senate yesterday, 13 February 2025.

Division 296, if passed, would impose an additional 15% tax on members with a $3 million or more total super balance (not indexed).

Division 296 is now unlikely to be put to the Senate before an election, and is expected to become a key election issue.

#division296 #$3million #unrealisedgains

Admitting debts to qualify creditors for interest: requirements on liquidators under section 563B of the Corporations Act.

Admitting debts to qualify creditors for interest: requirements on liquidators under section 563B of the Corporations Act.

In the decision of Park, Re Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq) (Statutory Interest)[1], Justice Downes held that liquidators must make a ‘conscious’ effort to determine who may be entitled to a company’s assets for debts to qualify for interest under section 563B of the Corporations Act 2001(Cth) (Act). [1] [2024] FCA 1300

T & A Skills Care Service – The importance of evidence for primary production land tax exemptions

T & A Skills Care Service – The importance of evidence for primary production land tax exemptions

The recent NCAT decision of T & A Skills Care Service Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] NSWCATAD 18 demonstrates the importance of a taxpayer discharging its evidentiary burden in claiming the primary production exemption from land tax.

Victorian land tax trust provisions – VCAT’s changing perspective

Victorian land tax trust provisions – VCAT’s changing perspective

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal decision of Caloutas as trustee for Caloutas Family Trust v Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] VCAT 82 has considered the interaction of bare or fixed trusts and the Victorian land tax trust surcharge provisions.

Navigating a Restructure Under the Corporations Act: Protection Against Contractual Rights to Help Your Business Get Back on Track

Navigating a Restructure Under the Corporations Act: Protection Against Contractual Rights to Help Your Business Get Back on Track

If your business is restructuring, contractual rights triggered solely by the restructure or financial distress may be rendered unenforceable under section 454N of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This statutory protection can help a business stabilise and continue trading through difficult times. This article reviews a recent case of Okami SA Newton Pty Ltd v Newton SC Pty Ltd which considered the operation of this section.

Unequivocally exposed: Lessons learned from ASIC’s greenwashing case against Active Super

Unequivocally exposed: Lessons learned from ASIC’s greenwashing case against Active Super

Active Super was found to have made false or misleading representations by using unequivocal language, and engaged in conduct liable to mislead the public in relation to investments it made.

The case provides further insights into the latest developments on ASIC’s ongoing greenwashing enforcement action.

Does failure to make minimum pension payments really cause a super pension to cease?

Does failure to make minimum pension payments really cause a super pension to cease?

Last year, the ATO has updated its ruling TR 2013/5 Income tax: when a superannuation income stream commences and ceases. This included that the ATO’s view that if a super pension ceases (eg because of failure to make minimum pension payments, that a new pension will not start until a new pension commences (eg via new pension documents).

New ASIC Guidance on Insolvent Trading

New ASIC Guidance on Insolvent Trading

On 6 December 2024, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) updated its Regulatory Guide: Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Guide for directors (RG 217).

The guide contains key principles intended to help directors comply with their duty to prevent insolvent trading and how to establish safe harbour protection through proactive monitoring and timely action.

Mergers and Acquisitions Reform

Mergers and Acquisitions Reform

2025 will see the biggest changes to Australia’s Mergers and Acquisitions regulatory landscape for a considerable time. On 10 December 2024, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Mergers and Acquisitions Reform) Bill 2024 received Royal Assent resulting in a shift from a voluntary informal review scheme to a mandatory administrative review process. This is a clear statement to focus on protecting competition through merger control.

Franchising Update: A Year in Review

Franchising Update: A Year in Review

This article will looks back on some of the key developments that occurred in the franchising sector in 2024, offering a reminder of changes and developments that occurred and foreshadowing what franchise businesses can expect in this coming year.

SCAM ALERT: Unsolicited Emails from Trademark/ Patents Registry Hub – Talk to your trusted professionals first

SCAM ALERT: Unsolicited Emails from Trademark/ Patents Registry Hub – Talk to your trusted professionals first

Scam emails from senders purporting to be Trade Mark Attorneys from “Trademark Registry Hub” or “Patents Registry Hub” are currently circulating with a number of our client’s reportedly receiving the same communication. These emails can be concerning and convincing. Here’s what to do.