Legal news
In 2022, the decision of the Federal Court in Minerva Financial Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2022] FCA 1092 raised the question that tax benefits emanating from trustee decisions could be subject Part IVA. At that time, we said we think ‘no’ (see here).
As we’ve noted previously, commercial and industrial properties sold or transferred on or from 1July 2024, will enter the new commercial and industrial property regime. Broadly, the regime will operate such that future transfers will not trigger land transfer (stamp) duty but rather the property will be subject to a (further) set of land tax, known as commercial and industrial property tax (CIPT).
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) has held in Quy v FCT [2024] AATA 245 that a taxpayer, who was physically in Australia for less than 2 months each year, was a resident of Australian tax purposes.
In the decision of Stern v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCAFC 21 the Full Federal Court found against the taxpayer, who raised an argument that Division 294 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 97) should not be interpreted such that both his pension was to be commuted under a commutation authority issued by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) due to his pensions exceeding his transfer balance cap, and that he also must pay excess transfer balance tax for exceeding his transfer balance cap.
On 24 January 2024, in Imbree v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWCATAD 22 (Imbree) the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) held land transfer (stamp) duty was payable with respect to transfer of property to a superannuation fund as the Deed was held to be an ‘agreement to transfer’ (and dutiable) and not a ‘transfer of property’ and therefore did not qualify for exemptions.
This is a cautionary tale for ensuring that discretionary trust deeds are amended correctly so that “foreign” land transfer (stamp) duty and land tax surcharges are not triggered. Unfortunately, in the decision of Khalil & Associates Pty Ltd ATF The George Khalil Family Trust v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWCATAD 23 (Khalil), the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) found the particular amendment did not prevent the triggering of such a surcharge.
The NSW Supreme Court decision of Cihan Family Trust v Cihan Family Superannuation Fund [2023] NSWSC 1289 found that a transfer of land from a family trust to a SMSF should be reversed on the basis of unconscionable conduct of a son against his father.
The case of Corbisieri v NM Superannuation Proprietary Limited [2023] FCA 1319 involved an appeal by the mother of a deceased against the decision of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to uphold a BDBN to benefit the de facto spouse of her late son, which was to be funded out of life insurance proceeds in AMP Superannuation.
In this Judgment of the NSW Supreme Court, a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) signed on the date of death of the sole member of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) was upheld. Challenges to the BDBN’s validity, by the SMSF trustee and two of the deceased’s executors, based on lack of capacity and unconscionability both failed.
Victoria has a wide range of significant State tax changes commencing 1 January 2024 which impact numerous individuals, businesses, and land holders. Many were introduced under the State Taxation Acts and Other Acts Amendment Act 2023 which received Royal Assent on 12 December 2023.
