Non-arm’s length income (NALI) has been a hot topic of discussion and debate in the SMSF industry in recent years, in particular since the ATO first released their draft ruling on non-arm’s length expenditure (NALE) in 2018 (and its subsequent iterations). Recently, the long debated amendments to NALE provisions were passed in Parliament and received Royal Assent in June 2024.

Whilst the saying, “the two certainties in life are death and taxes”, is still as relevant as ever, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) and the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) does at least provide a bit of leeway on the second one.[1] This session explores various exemptions and concessions available when it comes to tax and deceased estates, including:

Drafting is an art form which requires precision, practice and preferably access to a large bank of precedents to assist in tailoring what is required to the circumstances and by the parties the subject of an agreement.

As soon as the business or investment structure involves entities such as companies, it is inevitable that there will be intra-group loans arising from either:

In the current economic landscape, business owners may be considering a restructure, merger, or demerger to adapt, survive, or enable growth.

It is well known that Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 can apply to distributions or benefits provided by a company to a shareholder or associate, or a company that has an unpaid present entitlement from a trust.

The general requirement of an self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) is that all members must be trustees of the SMSF or directors of the SMSF corporate trustee. As such, putting aside disputes between trustees/directors, generally members are making the decisions about their benefits and the assets of the SMSF.

Trusts are generally known to have a flexibility that can achieve favourable tax outcomes, whether used as a vehicle for operating a business or as the entity to hold investments.

SMSFs (self managed superannuation funds) have been carrying on property development activities ever since SMSFs came into existence. Yet despite that there is still a common concern that such activities will cause the SMSF to become non-compliant, or subject to penalties, on the basis that such activities, and in particular undertaking a property development business, are prohibited.

Upon the death of a member of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF), the member’s benefits in the SMSF must be cashed ‘as soon as practicable’ after the member dies under regulation 6.21(1) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994.

Many business owners may be considering a restructure, merger, or demerger in the current economic environment to adapt, sustain, or promote growth in these tumultuous times. A change in a corporate structure typically entails either the change of ownership interests in the entire business or the transfer of specific assets of the business.

SMSFs (self managed superannuation funds) have been carrying on business and business like activities ever since SMSFs came into existence. Yet despite that there is still a common concern that such activities will cause the SMSF to become non-compliant, or subject to penalties, on the basis that such activities are prohibited.

As the economic effects of COVID-19 continue to be felt across the country, the regulatory landscape for SMSFs has also changed.

SMSFs (self managed superannuation funds) have been carrying on property development activities ever since SMSFs came into existence. Yet despite that there is still a common concern that such activities will cause the SMSF to become non-compliant, or subject to penalties, on the basis that such activities, and in particular undertaking a property development business, are prohibited.