BDBNs

,

Sladen Snippet – Corbisieri – BDBN invalid due to relationship breakdown

,
Sladen Snippet – Corbisieri – BDBN invalid due to relationship breakdown

The case of Corbisieri v NM Superannuation Proprietary Limited [2023] FCA 1319  involved an appeal by the mother of a deceased against the decision of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) to uphold a BDBN to benefit the de facto spouse of her late son, which was to be funded out of life insurance proceeds in AMP Superannuation.

Sladen Snippet – van Camp – deathbed BDBN found to be valid

Sladen Snippet – van Camp – deathbed BDBN found to be valid

In this Judgment of the NSW Supreme Court, a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) signed on the date of death of the sole member of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) was upheld. Challenges to the BDBN’s validity, by the SMSF trustee and two of the deceased’s executors, based on lack of capacity and unconscionability both failed.

,

Sladen Snippet – SMSF BDBNs not bound by SIS Regs – Hill v Zuda

,
Sladen Snippet – SMSF BDBNs not bound by SIS Regs – Hill v Zuda

In the much anticipated decision of Hill v Zuda Pty Ltd, the High Court has determined that regulation 6.17A of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SIS Regs) does not apply to binding death benefit nominations (BDBNs) prepared for self managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).