Trust Vesting: The Tax Implications

Trust Vesting: The Tax Implications

1. The High Court has described the trust as a “…creature of equity…” subject to the jurisdiction of a court of equity. The essential feature of every trust is that one person is an owner of property, but is bound to use their position as owner for the benefit of another or for the advancement of a purpose.

Bare trusts, resulting trusts and dealings in land

A Matter of Trusts

A failure to document a trust relationship at the time of acquisition may not always be fatal.

Introduction

Typically, but not always, land is legally and beneficially owned by the person registered on the title. However, sometimes the legal owner owns the land as trustee, the terms of which are supported by a written trust deed.

In the absence of a written trust deed, your client may maintain that the land is owned pursuant to a “bare trust” and the person registered on the title is the trustee (the legal owner) holding the land on trust for a beneficiary (the beneficial owner, or owners if there is more than one beneficiary).

Where the bare trust relationship is undocumented, the client might be concerned as to whether expected dealings in respect of the land trigger undesired tax outcomes.

In particular, issues can arise when:

  • the parties wish to vary the land title deed to record the beneficiary on the title (ie remove the trustee from the title);

  • a party has passed away and there is uncertainty about whether the land forms part of their estate; or

  • a party asserts that they qualify for the CGT main residence exemption in respect of the disposal of the land (and dwelling).

Is the absence of a written trust deed or declaration of trust at the time of purchase fatal? As discussed below, not necessarily, as objective facts can be persuasive in supporting the intentions of the parties.

The full paper is available to Sladen Smart Members sign up/login here to continue reading.

Super guarantee – Same, same but different

Super guarantee – Same, same but different

This paper has been built on a previous paper on the superannuation guarantee (SG) regime, titled Super Guarantee – no longer the toothless tiger. That paper was designed to take a holistic examination of the SG regime. In this paper, we have built on that approach and added a number of developments, including:

Who’s Running The Show: Keeping Control Of An SMSF

Who’s Running The Show: Keeping Control Of An SMSF

On the setting up of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF), the starting position is that, all members are required to be individual trustees or directors of a corporate trustee. However, life events such as incapacity and death, may require someone to fill the shoes of the replaced individual.

Super Guarantee – Same, Same But Different

Super Guarantee – Same, Same But Different

This paper has been built on a previous paper on the superannuation guarantee (SG) regime, titled Super Guarantee – no longer the toothless tiger. That paper was designed to take a holistic examination of the SG regime. In this paper, we have built on that approach and added a number of developments, including: