Who’s Running The Show: Keeping Control Of An SMSF

On the setting up of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF), the starting position is that, all members are required to be individual trustees or directors of a corporate trustee. However, life events such as incapacity and death, may require someone to fill the shoes of the replaced individual.

This session explores how this works in practice, including:

  • What role does a fund’s deed and company constitution, if applicable, have in determining a replacement trustee?

  • How significant is the role of shareholder of an SMSF corporate trustee?

    • succession of trustee

    • control of the SMSF

  • Enduring power of attorneys (EPOAs)

  • Lessons from cases

  • How is the fund taxed if a breach of the required number of trustees appointed occurs?

  • Checklist of action to take for trustee appointment:

    • on incapacity of a member

    • on death of a member

Leaving one person in control of an SMSF where another person is to benefit from the death benefits is a common issue we come across. In particular, where blended families are involved. Solutions include:

  • Second or separate super funds – especially for second spouses (eg Re Marsella);

  • Control of the shareholding in the SMSF corporate trustee – eg even where the surviving second spouse is the surviving director, the shares in the corporate trustee could pass to the children;

  • Guardian role in the SMSF eg even where the surviving second spouse is the surviving director/trustee, the children could be the guardians of the SMSF with the power to appoint and remove trustees;

  • BDBNs – this removes discretion but can still be problematic if the non-recipient is in control of the SMSF (eg Wooster v Morris).

The full paper is available to Sladen Smart Members sign up/login here to continue reading.