Franchisor Obligations for Communication with Franchisees: Lessons from Sec New Line Pty Ltd v Muffin Break Pty Ltd
Withholding information whilst negotiating agreements can amount to misleading and deceptive conduct. However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Sec New Line Pty Ltd v Muffin Break Pty Ltd provides important guidance on when silence will become deceptive, specifically in the context of lease and franchising renewals.
‘Subject to’: why these words can be a trap when contracting if you are not clear about what you intend.
The specific wording of a contract is crucial to its interpretation and may be beneficial or a trap to parties. Many parties fail to understand the implications that the well-known phrase ‘subject to contract’ will have on their agreements. Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 is the leading Australian case which examines the consequences of certain wording on parties to a contract, and whether such wording leads to an enforceable and binding contract.
Sladen Legal Property Team Recognised in Doyles Guide Victoria 2024
Bowerman: an unusual case that may have unusual implications
Is your Airbnb property eligible for the small business CGT concessions?
With land tax rate increases and surcharges imminent as a result of the Victorian State Budget for the 2023-2024 year (see our article here), Victorian landowners may be reconsidering their investment property portfolios and the merits of selling versus keeping.
Sladen Snippet – ATO takes aim at SMSFs and property development (again)
The ATO’s attacks on SMSFs conducting property development continues! The ATO has released Taxpayer Alert TA 2023/2 (the Alert) confirming that the ATO will review arrangements where related entities of a SMSF are conducting a property development (or including where property development is undertaken on SMSF owned assets) and where a special purpose vehicle (SPV) is used. The SPV being a company or trust which will be a related party to the SMSF through which generally a member of the SMSF may provide property development services to the SMSF for a commercial arm’s length fee and acquire and manage building materials used for the development.
Sladen Legal Property Team Recognised in Doyles Guide Victoria 2023
Sladen Legal Property Team Recognised In Doyle's Guide Victoria 2022
Windfall Gains Tax
Latest Legislative Developments In Property
The ATO's Current views on conducting property Development through an SMSF
Phil Broderick, Sladen Legal Principal presents on The ATO's Current views on conducting property Development through an SMSF at the CPA Australia City Taxation Discussion Group in August 2021.
The ATO’S Current Views on Conducting Property Development through an SMSF (Copy)
SMSFs (self managed superannuation funds) have been carrying on property development activities ever since SMSFs came into existence. Yet despite that there is still a common concern that such activities will cause the SMSF to become non-compliant, or subject to penalties, on the basis that such activities, and in particular undertaking a property development business, are prohibited.
McCarthy: sale of two-lot development taxed as ordinary income
Sladen snippet - Legislative Instrument permits LRBA borrowings by the bare trustee
As previously discussed here, the ATO has now finalized the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) In-house Asset Determination — Intermediary Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement Determination 2020 (Determination).
Transfers to Bare Trusts: Court of Appeal Provides Clarity on Duty Exemption
The Court of Appeal handed down its decision in MD Commercial Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] VSCA 295 in late 2019. The decision has provided further clarity on the application of section 35 of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) which provides an exemption from duty for transfers to bare trusts.
Sladen Snippet: COVID-19 – changes to foreign investment review regime announced
On 29 March 2020 the Federal Government announced changes to the foreign investment review regime as Australia continues to deal with the economic implications of COVID-19.
Once the legislation is passed, effective from 29 March 2020, all proposed foreign investment into Australia subject to the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 will require approval, regardless of the value of the investment or nature of the foreign investor. This is to be achieved by reducing to $0 the monetary screening thresholds for all foreign investment under the Act.
Sladen Snippet: Greig - Full Federal Court decision on capital revenue question
As we previously reported here, in the decision of Thawley J in Greig v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 1084 the taxpayer was unsuccessful in arguing the loss on selling shares was deductible on the basis he was in the business of dealing in shares. The taxpayer appealed this decision.
