BBlood v FCT: section 100A, more guidance on tax avoidance purpose
The Full Federal Court in the BBlood appeal found for the ATO on section 100A and the taxpayer dividend stripping (albeit on a technical, non-substantive basis).
The 100A analysis was limited to ‘tax avoidance purpose’ with the Full Court holding that, in certain circumstances, the purpose of advisors can be relevant.
Treasurer Confirms - Cryptocurrency Not treated as foreign currency
Is Cryptocurrency a Foreign Currency for Tax Purposes?
Taxpayers using cryptocurrency in their businesses, including as a means of paying expenses such as staff or contractors or as a means of deriving income through investments, mining or trading, is becoming more common. After a particularly volatile year for the values of cryptocurrency many taxpayers may have significant gains or losses associated with their cryptocurrency transactions.
Land development and sale: Are you sure you are not required to be registered for GST?
The oft-debated question as to whether the development, subdivision and sale of land constitutes the mere realisation of a capital asset in an enterprising way has once again been considered in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) case of Ian Mark Collins & Mieneke Mianno Collins ATF The Collins Retirement Fund and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) [2022] AATA 628 (Collins)
Draft Taxation Ruling 2022/D1: Do people still listen to disco music?
After our semi-serious opening statement on the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) recently released guidance on section 100A and unpaid present entitlements, this is one of a series of deep-dive articles on that guidance. These articles look at each of the ATO guidance products separately and then we discuss what the overall impact may be.
Multiple Party Investment Trust Structures – Part 1: Federal Taxes
Sladen Snippet – TD 2021/D5 genuine disposal restrictions in employee share schemes
Employee Share Schemes – another report champions essential reform!
The legislative and regulatory complexity of Employee Share Schemes has once again inspired recommended reforms, this time by the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Tax and Revenue, in a recent report.
McCarthy: sale of two-lot development taxed as ordinary income
TD 2021/5: ATO guidance on receiver’s obligation to retain money for post-appointment tax liabilities
Section 254 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 sets out the obligations, liabilities and rights of agents and trustees. An agent or trustee is answerable as taxpayer for things required to be done by the tax Acts in respect of income, or any profits or gains of a capital nature, derived by the agent or trustee in his/her representative capacity or derived by the principal by virtue of the agency.
Cryptocurrency Update: What are the Tax Implications of Staking Rewards and Airdrops?
Employee Share Schemes - Budget changes should boost participation
Attracting and retaining high performing employees can be key to ensuring the long-term success and growth of a business – a significant challenge for many Australian businesses navigating through COVID-19. Implementing an employee share scheme (ESS) or incentive plan can be an effective means by which businesses can attract, motivate, and retain valued employees.
Federal Budget 2021-22: The Tax Changes You Need to Know
Sladen Snippet - Khan: self-education expenses not deductible
AAT denies deductions for work-related expenses
AAT denies deductions for work-related expenses: Lambourne v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] AATA 4562
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) recently agreed with the Commissioner in disallowing certain deductions for work-related expenses.
Healius: Full Court finds payments to doctors not deductible
The Full Federal Court in FCT v Healius [2020] FCAFC 173 has upheld the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) appeal of the Federal Court decision in Healius v COT [2019] FCA 2011 which considered whether lump sum payments made by a medical centre to its doctors were assessable on revenue or capital account.
Pike: Full Court applies DTA and finds taxpayer is not an Australian tax resident
Over the last 18 months several decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Federal and Full Federal Courts considered the application of Australian tax residency laws including Harding v FCT [2019] FCAFC 29, FCT v Addy [2020] FCAFC 135, Stockton v FCT [2019] FCA 1679, Handsley v FCT [2019] AATA 917 and Coelho v FCT [2020] AATA 2474.
Eichmann: Full Court holds that land is a small business active asset
In our earlier articles we discussed the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and Federal Court decisions in Eichmann v FCT [2019] AATA 162 and FCT v Eichmann [2019] FCA 2155. The Full Federal Court in Eichmann v FCT [2020] FCAFC 155 recently allowed the taxpayer’s appeal of the Federal Court decision.
