The NSW Court of Appeal has affirmed on-demand loan repayments to shadow directors were reasonable where the company was solvent and the payments caused no detriment and as such do not constitute a breach of the unreasonable director related transaction provisions in section 588FDA of the Corporations Act.
Bakers Delight Case: What Franchisors Need to Know About Workplace Liability
The Full Court of the Federal Court’s decision in Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2025] FCAFC 144 provides insight into the interaction between franchisor liability and ‘reverse onus’ mechanisms in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Specifically, the Federal Court confirmed that franchisors can be held legally responsible for workplace contraventions by franchisees, even where the case against the franchisee relies on a ‘reverse onus of proof’. Franchisors are recommended to implement proactive compliance systems across their networks to avoid liability.
Sladen Snippet – PayDay Super Now Law: Key Changes to Employer Obligations, Disclosure, and Penalties
XLZH - discretionary trusts and pre-CGT assets - more on this to come?
Form vs Reality: Where franchisors may be liable for franchisee conduct – lessons from ASIC v Darranda.
The recent Federal Court decision in ASIC v Darranda Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1015 highlights that where a franchisor designs the systems, documents or marketing used by franchisees, it may be held liable for regulatory breaches in its network, even without direct dealings with consumers.
#franchising #franchisorliability #ASIC #RegulatoryCompliance
Sladen Snippet – New Div 296 tax – what we know and what we don’t?
New Division 296 tax, as outlined in a Treasury Fact Sheet, includes two indexed thresholds ($3 million and $10 million) and taxation on realised (not unrealised) earnings from 1 July 2026. However, critical details about how realised earnings will be calculated—particularly regarding pre-1 July 2026 gains—remain unclear.
#superannuation #SMSF #tax #Div296 #totalsuperbalance #$3million #unrealisedgains #10million
Sladen Snippet - Treasurer announces major changes to Div 296 tax – including removal of tax on unrealised gains
Changing a Franchise Business Structure: Take Aways from Netdeen Pty Ltd v Lindfield Pty Ltd
The 28 August 2025 decision of the Court of Appeal of New South Wales in Netdeen Pty Ltd (t/as GJ Gardner Homes) v Lindfield NSW Pty Ltd[i] highlights several important considerations for franchisees and franchisors alike when changing a business structure.
Franchisors should have consideration to the impact that this may have on their existing contractual obligations. Franchisees need to be aware of whether their existing agreements allow for this possibility and consider this prior to entering into a franchise agreement.
The decision also highlights the importance of clear drafting in contracts, even where there has been ostensible agreement between the parties.
Bendel Part III: summary of the parties’ submissions
The article explains the arguments contained in the parties’ submissions to the High Court in the appeal by the Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) from the Full Federal Court’s (Full Court) decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Bendel).
Super and death case studies part 3 – tax issues where BDBN directs death benefit payment of large property in-specie
This article is the third in a three-part series setting out practical solutions to common issues in super, tax and estate planning, with a particular focus on the tax impact of payments to beneficiaries.
Part 3 of our series looks at the tax issues which should be considered when paying death benefits in specie, including capital gains tax and the super ‘death tax’.
#superannuation #SMSF #deathtax #deathbenefits #estateplanning #deathbenefitdependant #CGT #inspecie #BDBN
Super and death case studies part 2 – super ‘death tax’ and achieving equality between beneficiaries
Super and death case studies part 1 – pre-death withdrawals
This article is the first in a three-part series setting out practical solutions to common issues in super, tax and estate planning, with a particular focus on the tax impact of payments to beneficiaries.
Part 1 of our series looks at how withdrawing super benefits before death can form part of a member’s overall estate planning.
Federal Court Ruling Highlights Risks of Unsubstantiated Franchise Forecasts
Update on Franchise Non-compliance Enforcement Activity: Cash Converters, Mobile Travel Agents and RAMS franchise systems
The ACCC has issued penalties to Cash Converters and Mobile Travel Agents for breaching the Franchising Code of Conduct by failing to update required information on the Franchise Disclosure Register.
Post the ASIC civil penalty proceedings against RAMS Financial Group over alleged systemic misconduct in its home loan operations a class action by former franchisees is now seeking to intervene in the ASIC matter, citing overlapping factual issues and concerns over reliance on Westpac’s internal findings. #franchising #disclosure #franchisor_liability
FCT v Bendel: one more piece but uncertainty remains
On 12 June 2025, the High Court granted the Commissioner special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Full Court Decision) that we wrote about here.
Licenced to operate: What the ASIC v RAMS litigation offers about licence models applying to franchise systems
The Schaper report in December 2023 recommended further evaluation of the merits of replacing the Franchising Code of Conduct with a licensing regime. This recommendation arose after a submission to the review by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Without detail of what a licensing regime may look like there is uncertainty about what any licensing regime may require. The recent case of ASIC v RAMS however provides an illustration of the effect a licensing regime may have on a franchisors. Click here to read more.
#franchising #licensing #franchisor_liability
Imprecise Contracts and Good Faith: Lessons from Beecham Motors Pty Ltd v General Motors Holden Australia NSC Pty Ltd
The language used in a contract can significantly impact its enforceability. Reliance on the incorporation of an obligation to act in good faith will not necessarily result in an outcome sought. This was considered in the recent Supreme Court decision in Beecham Motors Pty Ltd v General Motors Holden Australia NSC Pty Ltd, which provides guidance for those with or considering a franchise agreement and the drafters of franchise agreements. #franchise_agreements #good_faith #franchisee_group_action
Statutory Demands with Offsetting Claims and the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) : Can you Mix the Two?
On 6 March 2025, Associate Justice Barrett handed down his decision in the matter of Duke Ventures Wellington Street Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 75. In this case, the Court clarified when a debtor can rely on an offsetting claim to set aside a statutory demand in a dispute adjudicated under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) (SOPA).
#insolvency #statuory_demand #creditors #securityforpayments
Div 296 and “withdrawals”
If Div 296 comes back – what should members and SMSFs do?
With the recent Labor election victory, and a potentially friendlier Senate, it is likely that the proposed Division 296 tax of an additional 15% on members with a $3 million or more total super balance (not indexed) will be enacted. See here for our previous commentary on the measure.









