As noted in part 1 of our articles on the application of the Bendel decision to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), in our view, it is likely that the Courts will apply the Bendel decision to the SIS Act, such that the expanded definition of loan in the SIS Act will apply to arrangements that involve the advancement of principal with an obligation to repay and that it will not apply to a mere creditor and debtor arrangement.

As noted in part 1 of our articles on the application of the Bendel decision to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), in our view, it is likely that the Courts will apply the Bendel decision to the SIS Act, such that the expanded definition of loan in the SIS Act will apply to arrangements that involve the advancement of principal with an obligation to repay and that it will not apply to a mere creditor and debtor arrangement (like a UPE).

In this part 3 of the series we examine how this may play out in the in-house asset rules contained in Part 8 of the SIS Act.

As noted in part 1 of our articles on the application of the Bendel decision to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), in our view, it is likely that the Courts will apply the Bendel decision to the SIS Act, such that the expanded definition of loan in the SIS Act will apply to arrangements that involve the advancement of principal with an obligation to repay and that it will not apply to a mere creditor and debtor arrangement (like a UPE).

As discussed here, the recent decision of the Full Federal Court (Court) in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Bendel) has been a significant one in the private tax world.

On 19 February 2025, the Full Federal Court handed down its decision in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15. On 18 March 2025, the ATO applied for special leave and, on 19 March 2025, the ATO updated its interim decision statement (DIS) on the case.

We review the updated DIS below.

#Division 7A, #UPE, #Unpaid present entitlements, #Tax, #Trusts, #TD2022/11, #Bendel, #109D #Special leave #Decision Impact Statement

This paper tracks the legislative development of the unfair contract terms regime, recaps the basic elements and exemptions to the regime’s application and then recounts the historic development of the case law in respect of the regime.

This paper provides a basic outline of the key provisions of the Personal Properties Securities Act 2012 (Cth) (PPSA) and a detailed examination of eight cases adding to our understanding of the application of the PPSA to varying factual scenarios.

Given this is a superannuation conference, most of the presentations will be dealing with the uses of, and issues with, superannuation and self managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).

In the 2023-24 Budget, the Government announced that the super guarantee framework will be reformed to align the payment of super guarantee contributions with an employee’s regular pay cycle, instead of the current quarterly requirements. 

The exposure draft legislation for the new ‘Payday Super’ rules has now been released, with consultation open until 11 April 2025.

The super guarantee charge, payable where employers fail to make contributions in full and on time, will be updated, including a new ‘administrative uplift’ component of up to 60% of the shortfall amount.

In the decision of QWYN and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation and business) [2025] ARTA 83 the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) has determined that regular disability payments described as a superannuation income stream was a superannuation income stream for tax purposes and not a number of (more tax concessionally treated) disability lump sums.

In certain circumstances creditors can take direct action against directors of companies in liquidation  to recover insolvent trading losses suffered.

The process for doing so is to first try and obtain the liquidator’s consent and if they are not forthcoming, then take the steps required under subsections 588S and 588T of the Act.

The New South Wales Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against a decision that a pipeline was dutiable for the purposes of the New South Wales landholder duty provisions in Conexa Sydney Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] NSWCA 20.

Sladen Legal is proud to announce its membership in The Law Firm Network, a distinguished global association of independent law firms. This network enhances Sladen Legal’s ability to support clients who require international representation as well as clients of network firms seeking specialist Australian representation. 

Our team has prepared a practical guide to reducing underpayment risk. Please click on the link below to find out more.

The application of vacant residential land tax to holiday homes has caused much anxiety recently, particularly where that holiday home is held in a trust.

On 19 February 2025, the Full Federal Court, in FCT v Bendel [2025] FCAFC 15 (Bendel), held that an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) with a corporate beneficiary is not a loan under subsection 109D(3) of Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936).

In an previous article discussing the ACCC’s enforcement priorities for 2024-25, we noted that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has continued to monitor strict compliance with small business codes of conduct, including the Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).

In particular, the ACCC had pursued UltraTune, for contempt of Court when Ultratune failed to comply with orders made by the court requiring Ultratune to take specific actions. On 28 January 2025, UltraTune’s appeal was dismissed by the Full Federal Court.

UltraTune’s story serves as an important reminder to ensure active monitoring of business’ compliance with all the obligations including those imposed on them by the law or court order and those that they might voluntarily agree to undertake.

Working from home continues to present legal challenges for employers. Please read our latest update below.

Division 296 tax, the proposed new $3 million super fund tax on unrealised gains, did not pass in the Senate yesterday, 13 February 2025.

Division 296, if passed, would impose an additional 15% tax on members with a $3 million or more total super balance (not indexed).

Division 296 is now unlikely to be put to the Senate before an election, and is expected to become a key election issue.

#division296 #$3million #unrealisedgains