The recent Full Federal Court decision of Pintarich v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 79 dismissing the taxpayer’s appeal, considered whether a letter (the ATO Letter) from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) purportedly remitting the taxpayer’s general Interest charge (GIC) amounted to a ‘decision’ by the Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner). 

On 21 June 2018, Senator David Leyonhjelm of the Liberal Democratic Party Treasury proposed in the Senate that the amendments to the CGT small business concessions in the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Integrity and Other Measures) Bill 2018 (the Bill) apply, if passed, from 8 February 2018 (when the Bill was released in Exposure Draft form) rather than 1 July 2017 (as originally announced in the May 2017 Budget).

The recent Federal Court decision of Harding v FCT [2018] FCA 837 illustrates the difficulties of an Australian expatriate arguing they were resident of a foreign country, and thereby not an Australian tax resident.

With seven sitting days left in the current financial year, the Tax Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan Base Rate Entities) Bill 2017 (the Bill), that proposes to deny the lower 27.5% corporate tax rate to corporate tax entities with less than $25 million of turnover that derive predominantly (80% or more) passive income has not been debated by the Parliament since 12 February 2018. This Bill, if passed and assented to, will apply from 1 July 2017. That is, for the current income year.

On 17 May 2018, the ATO updated its practice statement (PS LA 2008/6) providing for a more robust and comprehensive process before the Commissioner can form an opinion there has been fraud or evasion.  Where the Commissioner forms an opinion there has been fraud or evasion by a taxpayer in a particular income year, he then has an unlimited amendment period in which to raise an amended assessment outside of the usual 2 or 4-year time limits.

A taxpayer has been charged with offences after losing a Victorian Court of Appeal case in which the taxpayer argued that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) could not prove service of a final notice requiring him to lodge four outstanding income tax returns by a specified date.

The recent Federal Court decision of Rowntree v FCT [2018] FCA 182, (Rowntree) dismissing the taxpayer’s appeal, considered whether amounts received by the taxpayer were income rather than loan receipts.

The Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) has power pursuant to section 255-15(1) of Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 to permit a taxpayer to pay its tax-related liability by instalments in accordance with a payment arrangement. The recent Federal Court decision of Stojic v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 483 (Stojic) dismissed an application by the sole director and shareholder of a company to review a decision by the Commissioner to decline to exercise that power illustrates two major points.

Division 6C was introduced in 1985 to tax public unit trusts like companies unless they restricted their activities to essentially passive investment activities (‘eligible investment business’). Stapled structures arose to allow the combination of trading activities, in a company, with associated non-trading assets in a trust to which Division 6C does not apply.

As widely reported in the media, the debate on the Tax Laws Amendment (Enterprise Tax Plan No. 2) Bill 2017 resumes on 8 May 2018 when the Parliament reconvenes for the Budget sittings.

two-tiered company tax rates create compliance and practical issues for trusts that distribute to bucket companies — not just for companies.