Sladen Events
For whom the Bendel tolls: Division 7A, UPEs and the end of the loan myth
The bell has tolled on the Commissioner's long-running argument that an unpaid present entitlement is a "loan" under Division 7A. In Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel [2026] HCA 18, a 5-2 High Court majority held that where a trustee's resolution effects a "setting aside" onto a separate trust, no loan arises under subsection 109D(3). The decision turns on the precise language of the trust deed and the resolution - and it changes the Division 7A calculus for every discretionary trust with a corporate beneficiary.
After Bendel: Division 7A, Anti-Avoidance, and Beyond
The Full Federal Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel (February 19, 2025) has redefined the tax landscape for trusts, ruling that unpaid present entitlements (UPEs) between a corporate beneficiary and a trust do not constitute a loan under s109D(3) of Division 7A.