Thank you for your submission
Your response is greatly appreciated.
The NSW Court of Appeal has affirmed on-demand loan repayments to shadow directors were reasonable where the company was solvent and the payments caused no detriment and as such do not constitute a breach of the unreasonable director related transaction provisions in section 588FDA of the Corporations Act.
The general requirement of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) is that all members must be trustees of the SMSF or directors of the SMSF corporate trustee.
We are honoured to announce that our esteemed consultant, Rob Jeremiah, will retire from active practice at Sladen Legal, effective 5 December 2025
The Victorian State Revenue Office has issued a draft revenue ruling “Land transfer duty - Consideration - Assumption of tax liabilities” for comment that seeks to impose a new stamp duty on adjustments at settlement of property transfers. This is an Australian first tax and will penalise commercial and other property transfers.
The Victorian Supreme Court in Alphington Developments Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2025] VSC 709 considered the dutiable value for a transfer of land under paragraph 20(1)(a) of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) and whether payments required to be made by the vendor under a contract were able to reduce the headline purchase price for stamp duty purposes.
The Appeal Panel within the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal determined whether the Tribunal erred in finding that the Trust Deed before them set out the trust as a special trust rather than a fixed trust within the meaning of section 3A of the Land Tax Management Act 1956 (NSW).
The Full Court of the Federal Court’s decision in Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2025] FCAFC 144 provides insight into the interaction between franchisor liability and ‘reverse onus’ mechanisms in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Specifically, the Federal Court confirmed that franchisors can be held legally responsible for workplace contraventions by franchisees, even where the case against the franchisee relies on a ‘reverse onus of proof’. Franchisors are recommended to implement proactive compliance systems across their networks to avoid liability.
Many will be familiar with the use of bare trusts by SMSFs as part of a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA), but there are other ways in which an SMSF might invest via a bare trust, providing different structuring opportunities. This article considers the use of ‘non LRBA bare trusts’ by SMSFs and the superannuation law implications.
PayDay Super is now law, with changes effective from 1 July 2026. The reforms introduce a new voluntary disclosure regime and a new penalty framework for non-compliance. Stay ahead of the changes and understand your new obligations.
Increasingly, individuals hold a substantial amount of their wealth within the superannuation system. Productivity Commission research paper, Wealth transfers and their economic effects, December 2021 provides as follows:
The ART decision in XLZH v FCT looked at whether pre-CGT assets owned by a discretionary trust kept that status under Division 149 and to the extent to which ATO Ruling IT 2430 can be relied upon in applying Division 149.
#CGT, #Division 149, #discretionary trusts, #Tax, #IT 2430
The recent Federal Court decision in ASIC v Darranda Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1015 highlights that where a franchisor designs the systems, documents or marketing used by franchisees, it may be held liable for regulatory breaches in its network, even without direct dealings with consumers.
#franchising #franchisorliability #ASIC #RegulatoryCompliance

