Sladen Thoughts
Stay up to date with Legal Industry news and updates. Sladen Legal provide regular updates on changes and news in the Australian Legal Industry.
If you are looking for our papers and journal articles including Taxation in Australia, The Tax Institute and SMSF Association, these are available in our Sladen Smart Membership Platform, become a member or login to gain exclusive access.
Author
- Alicia Hill
- Andrea Lin
- Daniel Smedley
- Dean Beaumont
- Edward Skilton
- Edward Hennebry
- Jake Cole
- James Gao
- Jan Harnischmacher
- Jasmine O'Brien
- Jordan Bauer
- Kaitilin Lowdon
- Kseniia Gasiuk
- Magdalena Njokos
- Matthew Davis
- Meagan O'Connor
- Michelle Dowdle
- Neil Brydges
- Nicholas Clifton
- Phil Broderick
- Phil Broderick
- Philippa Briglia
- Rob Jeremiah
- Sarah Wedd-Elliot
- Sladen Legal
- Sladen Legal
- Thomas Howell
- Thomas Howell
- Victor Di Felice
- Will Monotti
- Will Monotti
Categories
- Asset Protection
- Business Contracts
- Business Law
- Business Structuring
- Business Succession
- Commercial Contracts
- Commercial Disputes
- Commercialisation
- Conference Papers
- Copyright
- Corporate Advisory
- Cryptocurrency
- Digital Law
- Dispute Resolution
- Employee Share Schemes
- Employment Law
- Entertainment and Sports
- Entrepreneurial
- Estate Disputes
- Estate Litigation
- Family Business
- Federal Taxes
- Franchising
- IP Disputes
- Insolvency
- Intellectual Property
- Inventions
- Land Tax
- Landholder Duty
- Learning
- Managing IP
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Payroll Tax
- Personal Succession
- Property & Development
- Property Disputes
- Publications
- Sladen Legal News
- Sladen Snippet
- Small Business
- Stamp Duty
- Startups
- State Tax Disputes
- State Taxes
- Superannuation
- Tax Consolidation
- Tax Disputes
- Taxation
- Technology
- Trade Marks
Sladen Snippet - Another SMSF civil penalty case
The Federal Court has handed down another civil penalty decision for breaches by self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustees of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act).
In the case of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Superannuation) v Ryan [2015] FCA 1037 the Federal Court fined the two trustees of an SMSF $20,000 each for breaching the sole purpose test, the prohibition against providing members with financial assistance, the in-house asset rules and the requirement to make investments on an arm’s length basis. This was as a result of the SMSF lending to the members over $200,000. Most of these loans were never paid back to the SMSF ultimately leaving the SMSF with about $6,000 in assets. In addition, the members were disqualified as trustees.