2020 National Superannuation Online Conference

The Tax Institute

SMSFs (self managed superannuation funds) have been carrying on property development activities ever since SMSFs came into existence. Yet despite that there is still a common concern that such activities will cause the SMSF to become non-compliant, or subject to penalties, on the basis that such activities, and in particular undertaking a property development business, are prohibited.

There is no express prohibition on SMSFs undertaking property development activities or a property development business. Rather, the question is whether such activities cause the SMSF to breach the provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) or the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SIS Regs) or adverse tax consequences under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA97) or the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA36).

This position has been confirmed in the ATO’s SMSF Regulator’s Bulletin SMSFRB 2020/1 (Bulletin). In the Bulletin the ATO has confirmed that an SMSF can carry on a property development either directly or through an entity or joint venture. However, the ATO has used  the Bulletin to raise its concerns about SMSFs being involved in such arrangements.

This paper is based on a paper I have presented on over the last few years on SMSFs and property development and includes the comments from the Bulletin. 

The full presentation is available to Sladen Smart Members sign up/login here to continue reading.