AAT strikes a blow against the ATO’s NALI crusade

AAT strikes a blow against the ATO’s NALI crusade

The ATO has taken an aggressive approach on non-arm’s length income (NALI) for a number of years now, both in its public documents and via its audit teams. This has culminated in an approach that puts a high expectation on SMSF’s in relation to proving arrangements are on an arm’s length basis – in particular, in relation to benchmarking such arrangements.

NSW foreign surcharges – international tax treaties update – more countries excluded from the regime

NSW foreign surcharges – international tax treaties update – more countries excluded from the regime

In our previous article, we discuss Revenue NSW’s announcement that it has determined that NSW surcharge purchaser duty and surcharge land tax are inconsistent with international tax treaties entered into by the Australian Federal Government and certain countries (Treaty Countries).

On 29 May 2023, Revenue NSW has updated its list of Treaty Countries to now include India, Japan, Norway and Switzerland.

Victorian State Budget 2023/24 – The good, the bad and the ugly

Victorian State Budget 2023/24 – The good, the bad and the ugly

The Victorian State Budget for the 2023-2024 year (Budget) brings with it a range of state taxation measures aimed at reigning in the Victorian Government’s surging debt, currently projected at $135.4 billion for the 2023-2024 tax year and set to grow to an “eye-watering” $171.4 billion in the 2026-2027

Sladen Snippet – Williams Part 2 - another SMSF trustee bites the dust

Sladen Snippet – Williams Part 2 - another SMSF trustee bites the dust

As seen in Part 1 of our article on the case of Williams v Williams, this is the latest of a long line of cases that have found that a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) was not binding. However, the case also is an important decision in relation to when the Court will remove an SMSF trustee.

Sladen Snippet – Williams Part 1 - another BDBN bites the dust

Sladen Snippet – Williams Part 1 - another BDBN bites the dust

In the case of Williams v Williams, the Supreme Court of Queensland has determined that a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) was not binding on the basis that it was not provided to the trustees of the applicable self managed superannuation fund (SMSF).

Sladen snippet – employees to be given right to enforce super contributions

Sladen snippet – employees to be given right to enforce super contributions

One of the anomalies of the super guarantee system is the inability of employees to force employers to make contributions payable under the system. That could soon change, with proposed changes to the Fair Work Act 2009 which would allow employees to force employers to make contributions to avoid the liability to pay the super contribution charge under the Superannuation Guarantee Charge Act 1992 (SG Act)

Sladen Snippet - Super to be paid on an employee’s payday

Sladen Snippet - Super to be paid on an employee’s payday

The Government has announced that, from 1 July 2026, employers will obligated to make super contributions at the same time they pay their employee’s their salary and wages (eg weekly, fortnightly or monthly). Currently, super must be made within 28 days of the end of each quarter.

Sladen Snippet – ATO issues a draft legislative instrument to ensue directors (and politicians) can make personal deductible contributions

Sladen Snippet – ATO issues a draft legislative instrument to ensue directors (and politicians) can make personal deductible contributions

As a result of recent changes to the work test, a technical deficiency was identified, such that, persons who are not common law employees, like directors and politicians, could no longer make personal deductible superannuation contributions.

Sladen Snippet - Jamsek – truck driver partnerships not eligible for super guarantee

Sladen Snippet - Jamsek – truck driver partnerships not eligible for super guarantee

The Full Federal Court has confirmed in Jamsek v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2023] FCAFC 48 that a truck driver partnership was not eligible for super guarantee contributions.  The decision is an important decision in relation the application to super guarantee in relation to contractors and, in particular, partnerships and other entities.

Thomas & Naaz – Payments To Doctors Subject To Payroll Tax

Thomas & Naaz – Payments To Doctors Subject To Payroll Tax

The New South Wales Court of Appeal (NSWCA) in Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2023] NSWCA 40 has dismissed a medical practice’s appeal and upheld the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal Appeal Panel’s (Appeal Panel) decision that payments from a medical practice to doctors, who worked at the practice, are subject to payroll tax.

NSW Government determines that surcharge purchaser duty and surcharge land tax is inconsistent with international tax treaties

NSW Government determines that surcharge purchaser duty and surcharge land tax is inconsistent with international tax treaties

On 21 February 2023 Revenue NSW announced that it has been determined that NSW surcharge purchaser duty and surcharge land tax (Surcharge Provisions) are inconsistent with international tax treaties entered into by the Australian Federal Government with New Zealand, Finland, Germany, and South Africa (Treaty Countries).

Windfall Gains Tax Deductions Shelved

Windfall Gains Tax Deductions Shelved

The introduction of windfall gains tax under the Windfall Gains Tax and State Taxation and Other Acts Further Amendment Act 2021 (Vic) (Act) has been highly controversial from the outset due to real concerns as to whether the tax truly captures a purported “windfall” by landowners who rezone land in Victoria and its punitive tax rate of 50% of such gains.

Treasury proposes NALI tax rate of 225%

Treasury proposes NALI tax rate of 225%

After industry pushback against the disproportionate application of the non-arm’s length income (NALI) and non-arm’s length expenses (NALE) rules, Treasury has a released a discussion paper to modify the application of the NALI/NALE rules.

Vicinity Funds – Choice of forum for state taxes matters - Supreme Court vs VCAT

Vicinity Funds – Choice of forum for state taxes matters - Supreme Court vs VCAT

The High Court of Australia has dismissed the special leave application by the taxpayer, Vicinity Funds Re Ltd (Taxpayer) to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal).   

Sladen Snippet – ATO warns on SMSF gift and loan back (asset protection) arrangements

Sladen Snippet – ATO warns on SMSF gift and loan back (asset protection) arrangements

In an interesting development, the ATO has released a warning in relation to SMSFs entering into gift and loan back arrangements.

TR 2022/3: personal services income: key changes from draft ruling TR 2021/D2

TR 2022/3: personal services income: key changes from draft ruling TR 2021/D2

On 23 November 2022, the Australian Tax Office (ATO) released Taxation Ruling TR 2022/3, finalising its views on personal services income (PSI) and personal services businesses (PSB).

Primary production land tax exemption denied for landowner that entered into a property development agreement

Primary production land tax exemption denied for landowner that entered into a property development agreement

In the recent Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) decision in Lavender Rain Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Review and Regulation) [2022] VCAT 1264 (Lavender Rain) the primary production land tax exemption for urban zoned land was denied on the basis that the land owning company operated a number of businesses, including the entering into a property development agreement.

Section 100A: if you want BBlood, you’ve got it: 100A and capital amounts

Section 100A: if you want BBlood, you’ve got it: 100A and capital amounts

On 19 September 2022, Justice Thawley of the Federal Court handed down his decision in BBlood Enterprises Pty Ltd v FCT [2022] FCA 1112 (BBlood), the most recent decision on section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) was successful in arguing that section 100A applied.